echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Front Oncol: The efficacy of initial laparoscopic surgery (PLA) and open surgery (OA) in the treatment of T1b/T2 stage gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients

    Front Oncol: The efficacy of initial laparoscopic surgery (PLA) and open surgery (OA) in the treatment of T1b/T2 stage gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients

    • Last Update: 2021-12-03
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary tract, with high mortality and poor prognosis
    .


    Due to the lack of optimal treatment, GBC is considered a highly fatal disease, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%


    Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary tract, with high mortality and poor prognosis


    Research Screening 2011 Nian 1 Yue Zhi 2018 Nian 8 month period diagnosis T1b / T2 GBC surgical patients
    .


    Assess overall survival (OS) , disease-free survival (DFS) and safety


    Research Screening 2011 Nian 1 Yue Zhi 2018 Nian 8 month period diagnosis T1b / T2 GBC surgical patients


    A total of 114 patients were included in the study, of which 61 were treated with OA and 53 were treated with PLA


    Number of PLA and OA treatments at different time points

    Number of PLA and OA treatments at different time points

    Compared with PLA and OA treatment, OS (HR=1.
    572; 95%CI: 0.
    866 2.
    855; p = 0.
    13) and DFS (HR=1.
    225; 95% CI, 0.
    677 2.
    218; p = 0.
    49) were not statistically different between the two groups
    .

    Compared with PLA and OA treatment, OS (HR=1.
    572; 95%CI: 0.
    866 2.
    855; p = 0.
    13) and DFS (HR=1.
    225; 95% CI, 0.
    677 2.
    218; p = 0.
    49) were not statistically different between the two groups
    .


    Compared with PLA and OA treatment, OS (HR=1.


                OS treated in both groups

    OS treated in both groups

                  DFS treated in both groups

                  DFS treated in both groups

    In addition, there were fewer intraoperative drainages after PLA, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (PLA 1.
    3 vs.
    OA 1.
    4, p = 0.
    253)
    .


    PLA does not significantly increase the intraoperative blood loss of GBC patients (PLA 257.


    In addition, there were fewer intraoperative drainages after PLA, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (PLA 1.


                Comparison of secondary prognostic indicators of treatment between the two groups

    Comparison of secondary prognostic indicators of treatment between the two groups

    Multivariate analysis found that LNs positive (p = 0.
    032) and tumor differentiation (p = 0.
    048) were independent risk factors for OS after PLA .
    Multivariate analysis did not find independent risk factors for DFS after PLA .
    Patients with good or poor OS who were treated with PLA had similar recurrence rates (p = 0.
    402) .
    In addition, positive LNs (p = 0.
    005) was considered an independent risk factor for OS after OA .
    In addition, age (p = 0.
    013) , gallbladder stones (p = 0.
    008) , tumor size (p = 0.
    028) and positive LNs (p = 0.
    044) are potential risk factors for DFS after OA .

    Multivariate analysis found that LNs positive (p = 0.


    032) and tumor differentiation (p = 0.
    048) were independent risk factors for OS after PLA .
    Multivariate analysis did not find independent risk factors for DFS after PLA .
    Patients with good or poor OS who were treated with PLA had similar recurrence rates (p = 0.
    402) .


    In summary, studies have shown that PLA for T1b/T2 stage GBC is comparable to OA in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes


    Original source:

    Cao J, Wang Y, Zhang B, Hu J, Topatana W, Li S, Juengpanich S, Lu Z, Cai X and Chen M (2021) Comparison of Outcomes After Primary Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for T1b/T2 Gallbladder Cancer.


    Front.
    Oncol.
    11:758319.
    doi: 10.
    3389/fonc.
    2021.
    758319

    Cao J, Wang Y, Zhang B, Hu J, Topatana W, Li S, Juengpanich S, Lu Z, Cai X and Chen M (2021) Comparison of Outcomes After Primary Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for T1b/T2 Gallbladder Cancer.
    Front.
    Oncol.
    11:758319.
    doi: 10.
    3389/fonc.
    2021.
    758319 leave a message here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.