Is it harmful for babies to keep milking at half an age? Breast milk and milk powder should not be opposed

20
20

20
, 2005, a media report entitled "Giving up and overemphasized breastfeeding is not scientific". As soon as the report came out, it was criticized and even "bombarded" by breast milk promotion agencies., China's breastfeeding rate is significantly lower than the world average. The main reasons are the real life pressure of young parents, but also the milk powder industry for quite a long time misleading publicity. In recent years, breastfeeding campaigns have increased, but the actual effect has not been significant - accepting "breastfeeding well" and "breastfeeding" is not the same thing after all. Although the state has banned the promotion of infant milk powder in paragraph
1
(
0
-
6
months), the milk powder industry has been playing the edge ball in promoting products.milk and milk powder, almost in opposition. However, this confrontation should not have arisen.milk powder and breast milk should not be equal competition. Milk powder is an alternative to breastfeeding. Whether it's the World Health Organization, the American Children's Medical Association or China's Ministry of Health, the positioning of breast milk and milk powder is consistent: breast milk is the best food for infants; Breastfeeding is better not only for the health of the baby, but also for the health of the mother. These institutions recommend
breast milk
6 months, after which breast milk is the main but the addition of complementary foods until the age of one. If conditions permit, breast milk can continue until two years of age or more. However, nutrition should come mainly from regular foods after age, and breast milk or milk is only part of the diet., however, it should also be noted that many breast-milk advocates and institutions are not appropriate in promoting breastfeeding and denigrate milk powder feeding. According to the World Health Organization and the American Association of Children's Medicine, "formula is second-good, but it's good enough." Breastfeeding should be promoted and promoted, but not every mother can do so. With advances in technology, formula is enough to support the healthy growth of infants. Many breast-feeding advocates have downplayed the milk-feeding, often giving the impression that "milk-fed mothers don't love their children enough" - a unfair rebuke to mothers who have to be fed milk powder.the notion that breastfeeding is best, the vast majority of mothers do. Rather than repeating this idea as a missionary, it makes more sense to actively improve the breastfeeding environment - most mothers would be happy to choose if breastfeeding were possible. Many breast-milk advocacy groups have attributed the increase in breastfeeding rates to "too short maternity leave" and have called on the State to extend maternity leave to
6
months or even a year. However, this proposal is not realistic. At present, women's employment in reality does face a lot of discrimination, infertile women's job search has been in an unequal competitive position. If maternity leave were to be extended, the job search situation for infertile women could worsen - even if wages were paid by the state during maternity leave, as many advocates had hoped, the discontinuity of jobs would be enough to prompt businesses to reject unfertifed female job seekers. In China today, the number of people who can afford to be a "full-time mother" is still in the minority. Most young couples still need to work together to maintain a standard of living, which naturally includes the standard of living of their children.U.S. does not have statutory maternity leave, and many employers give only
,
weeks of maternity leave, but that doesn't mean breastfeeding isn't possible. Society can also make many efforts to improve the breast-milk environment, such as calling for or even forcing the establishment of "pumping rooms" in the workplace and the provision of refrigerators for breast-milk preservation;