Is losing weight really the same as burning calories, the researchers said

According to the latest study, weight loss is not equivalent to burning calories, and this study suggests that proper diets can help burn more. The study challenges the idea of calories in metabolism, and a low-glycemic load diet is more effective after weight loss than traditional pathways.David Ludwi
g
, head of

New Balance Foundation Education Prevention Center Boston Children's Hospital
, told
we believe that, contrary to dogbic nutrition guidelines, calories burned in all ways are unethical."published in
JAMA
, the researchers analyzed theeffects of three diets on macro-nutritional composition and 's hypoglycemia load diet on
energy consumption and weight loss
The team, led by Professor
Cara Ebbeling
, developed three cross-experiments, including
21,
overweight adolescents, and found that
's
low-carbohydrate and
-low-glucose diets were more energy-efficient than those on low-fat diets, even though all subjects consumed equal amounts of energy.explains that "a low-fat diet is
300,
more calories than a low-carbohydrate diet (which is equivalent to the energy consumed by an hour of high-intensity physical activity).recommend lowering hypoglycemic load diets instead of controlling dietary fat for weight loss and prevention of cardiovascular disease., maintaining a successful diet requires action and environmental regulation, as well as long-term, relevant dietary plans. In addition, weight loss will be better understood of biological changes.Professor
Marion Nestle
of New York University stressed in her comments on the Food Politics blog that if the latest study is correct, a low-carbohydrate diet would be the best choice if people wanted to maintain long-term weight loss and eat a high-fat diet. In contrast, eating a combination of low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets can make it difficult to lose weight.study,
21,
adult subjects between the ages of
18 and 40,
were required to lose
10% to 15%
of their body weight first, and then maintain weight stability by randomly eating the following three diets, each for
4
weeks.the randomized cross-experimental design, it is necessary to closely observe how each diet affects each subject, the order of feeding is not required.a low-fat diet that reduces dietary fat to increase whole grains and a variety of fruits and vegetables,
60%
of energy comes from carbohydrates,
20%
from fat,
20%
from protein.hypoglycemic load diet consists of less processed grains, vegetables, healthy fats, legumes, and fruits, which contain
40%
of energy from carbohydrates,
40%
from fat and
20%
from protein.a low-carbohydrate diet, carbohydrates provide
10%
energy, fat provides
60%
energy, and protein provides
30%
energy.researchers looked at subjects who ate a low-carbon diet and found that a -low-glycemic loaded diet had similar

benefits to low-carbohydrate metabolism, with no negative effects of stress and inflammation
.low-carbon diet reduces the likelihood of a sharp rise in blood sugar after a meal, so
for those who want to keep losing weight
a low-glycemic load diet and a low-carbohydrate diet are better than a low-fat diet.Ebbeling
added, "In addition to the benefits mentioned above, a low-glycemic load diet provides more energy for a day than a low-carbohydrate and low-fat diet, in addition to providing a more complete range of foods in a low-glycemic load diet than a low-fat and very low-carbohydrate diet, which is also easier to produce and more durable."