JAMA: Anaesthetic and the prognosis of nerve function in patients with stroke thrombosis

In non-randomized studies, acute ischemicstrokepatientsthrombosisthe procedure was associated with adverse nerve prognosis, but three single-center randomized trials showed no significant difference in prognosis between patients receiving general anaesthetic compared to procedural sedationRecently, the researchers compared the difference between the total hemp in the pre-circulated acute ischemic stroke thrombosis and the three-month functional outcome after the procedure sedationthis study is a systematic overview and a meta-analysis study, collecting relevant data as of July 31, 2019The main endpoint of the study was disability, with a revised Rankin (mRS) score (0-6; a lower score representing less disability)total of 368 participants, with an average age of 71.5 years and 44.3 percent for women, with an average NIHSS score of 17, including 183 patients with all hemp (49.7 percent) and 185 patients with procedure sedation (50.3 percent)The 3-month mRS score was 2.8 for all-hemp patients, 3.2 for procedure sedation, and 1.58 for ORIn pre-set adverse events, only low blood pressure (20% lower than baseline, 80.8% vs 53.1%) and blood pressure fluctuations (arterial pressure of 180 or 120 mm Hg, 79.7 vs 62.3%) were high in the whole hemp groupstudy concluded that general anaesthetic in pre-circulated acute ischemic stroke thrombosis did not increase the patient's risk of neuroprogory for 3 months