echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Study of Nervous System > JAMA N: ESUS patients with left ventricular dysfunction should be the first choice for anticoagulation, not aspirin

    JAMA N: ESUS patients with left ventricular dysfunction should be the first choice for anticoagulation, not aspirin

    • Last Update: 2022-01-23
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Worldwide, approximately 2 million ischemic strokes of unidentified cause occur each year
    .


    These strokes are classified as cryptogenic and account for approximately 17% of all ischemic strokes


    Embolic stroke of unknown origin Anticoagulation in ESUS patients with undetermined origin is not superior to aspirin in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke and systemic embolism


    In December 2021, Alexander E.
    Merkler et al.
    from the United States published the results of a subgroup analysis of the NAVIGATE ESUS randomized clinical trial in JAMA Neurology, with the aim of verifying that anticoagulation therapy is effective in reducing recurrent stroke in patients with ESUS and LV dysfunction.
    Is it better than aspirin
    .

    The NAVIGATE ESUS trial is a randomized Phase 3 clinical trial with enrollment from December 2014 to September 2017
    .


    459 stroke centers in 31 countries participated in the study


    During a median follow-up of 10.
    4 months, the study examined the effect of rivaroxaban in reducing (1) primary outcome: recurrent stroke or systemic embolism and (2) secondary outcomes: recurrent stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction or whether it is superior to aspirin in terms of cardiovascular mortality
    .


    The presence of LV dysfunction was locally determined by echocardiography and defined as moderate to severely impaired global LV contractility and/or regional wall motion abnormalities


    Whether rivaroxaban was superior to aspirin in reducing (1) primary outcome: recurrent stroke or systemic embolism and (2) secondary outcome: recurrent stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular mortality


    The authors concluded that, in this post hoc exploratory analysis, rivaroxaban was superior to aspirin in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism in ESUS participants with left ventricular dysfunction


    Rivaroxaban was superior to aspirin in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism in ESUS participants with left ventricular dysfunction Ban is better than aspirin

    Original source:

    Original source:

    Alexander E.


    Left Ventricular Dysfunction Among Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and the Effect of Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin: A Subgroup Analysis of the NAVIGATE ESUS Randomized Clinical Trial Leave a Comment here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.