echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Study of Nervous System > JOS: Prediction of outcomes of cerebral vein thrombosis – IN-REvASC score

    JOS: Prediction of outcomes of cerebral vein thrombosis – IN-REvASC score

    • Last Update: 2022-11-25
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke, with an estimated incidence of approximately 1.
    5 cases per 100,000 person-years
    .
    Here, scholars from the United States identified risk factors and derived and validated prognostic scores
    for neurological ill and death for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT).

    The researchers conducted an international multicenter retrospective study of patients with continuous CVT from January 2015 to December 2020
    .
    Demographic, clinical and radiological features
    were collected.
    Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for adverse outcomes, i.
    e.
    , mRS 3-6
    .

    Results A total of 1025 patients were analysed, with a median follow-up of 375 days (interquartile range [IQR], 180 to 747).

    The median age was 44 years (IQR, 32 to 58), and 62.
    7% were female
    .

    Multivariate analysis showed that the following factors were associated with adverse outcomes at 90 days follow-up: active cancer (OR = 11.
    20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.
    62 to 27.
    14; P< 0.
    001), age (OR = 1.
    02 (per year); 95% CI, 1.
    00-1.
    04; P=0.
    039), black ethnicity (OR=2.
    17; 95% CI, 1.
    10 to 4.
    27; P=0.
    025), encephalopathy or coma at onset (OR=2.
    71; 95% CI, 1.
    39-5.
    30; P=0.
    004), decreased hemoglobin (OR=1.
    16/g/dL; 95%CI,1.
    03-1
    。 31; P=0.
    014), NIHSS was higher at onset (OR=1.
    07 (per minute); 95% CI, 1.
    02 to 1.
    11; P = 0.
    002), and drug use (OR=2.
    34; 95% CI, 1.
    16-4.
    71; P=0.
    017).

    In predicting adverse outcomes at 90 days follow-up, IN-REvASC scores were superior to ISCVT-RS (area under curve [AUC] = 0.
    84 [95% CI, 0.
    79 to 0.
    87] vs.
    AUC = 0.
    71 [95% CI, 0.
    66 to 0.
    76], χ2 P <0.
    001) and mortality (AUC = 0.
    84 [95% CI, 0.
    78 to 0.
    90] vs.
    AUC = 0.
    72 [95% CI, 0.
    66 to 0.
    79], χ2 P=0.
    03)

    In summary, seven factors were associated
    with adverse neurological outcomes following CVT.
    Compared with ISCVT-RS, INREvASC scores improve the accuracy of
    prognosis.
    Identifying patients at highest risk of poor prognosis in CVT can aid clinical decision-making and target treatment for patients in future clinical trials
    .

     

    References:

    Outcome Prediction in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The IN-REvASC Score.
    https://doi.
    org/10.
    5853/jos.
    2022.
    01606

    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.