echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Anesthesia Topics > 【Literature Reading】Effects of regional anesthesia and general anesthesia on the incidence of delirium after hip fracture surgery in the elderly

    【Literature Reading】Effects of regional anesthesia and general anesthesia on the incidence of delirium after hip fracture surgery in the elderly

    • Last Update: 2022-10-20
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    Click on the blue word Follow us

    Effect of Regional vs General Anesthesia on Incidence of Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery

    Effect of regional and general anesthesia on the incidence of delirium after hip fracture surgery in the elderly

    IMPORTANCE

    IMPORTANCE In adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, regional anesthesia may reduce postoperative delirium, but there is uncertainty about its effectiveness.

    Importance Regional anaesthesia may reduce postoperative delirium in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, but its effectiveness is uncertain
    .

    OBJECTIVE

    OBJECTIVE To  investigate, in older adults undergoing surgical repair for hip fracture, the effects of regional anesthesia on the incidence of postoperative delirium compared with general anesthesia.

    Objective To investigate the effect of regional anesthesia on the incidence of
    postoperative delirium compared with general anesthesia in elderly people undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture.

    DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

    DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized, allocation-concealed, open-label,

    multicenter clinical trial of 950 patients, aged 65 years and older, with or without preexisting dementia, and a fragility hip fracture requiring surgical repair from 9 university teaching hospitals in Southeastern China.
    Participants were enrolled between October 2014 and September 2018; 30-day follow-up ended November 2018.

    Design, setup, and pairing A randomized, distribution-hidden, open-label, multicenter clinical trial of 950 patients aged 65 years of age, with or without previous dementia, and patients with fragility hip fractures requiring surgical repair
    from nine university teaching hospitals in southeastern China.
    Participants were registered between October 2014 and September 2018 and followed up to 30 days as of November
    2018.

    INTERVENTIONS

    INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive either regional anesthesia (spinal,

    epidural, or both techniques combined with no sedation; n = 476) or general anesthesia

    (intravenous, inhalational, or combined anesthetic agents; n = 474).

    Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive regional anaesthesia (lumbar anaesthesia, epidural, or a combination of both, without sedation, n=476) or general anaesthesia (intravenous, inhalation, or combination anaesthetic, n=474).

    MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

    MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome was incidence of delirium during the first 7 postoperative days.
    Secondary outcomes analyzed in this article include delirium severity,duration, and subtype; postoperative pain score; length of hospitalization; 30-day all-cause mortality; and complications.

    Primary Results and Measurements The primary outcome is the incidence
    of delirium in the first 7 days after surgery.
    Secondary outcomes analysed here included severity, duration, and subtype of delirium; Postoperative pain score; length of hospital stay; 30-day all-cause mortality and complications
    .

    RESULTS

    RESULTS Among 950 randomized patients (mean age, 76.
    5 years; 247 [26.
    8%] male), 941 were evaluable for the primary outcome (6 canceled surgery and 3 withdrew consent).
    Postoperative delirium occurred in 29 (6.
    2%) in the regional anesthesia group vs 24 (5.
    1%) in the general anesthesia group (unadjusted risk difference [RD], 1.
    1%; 95% CI, –1.
    7% to3.
    8%; P= .
    48; unadjusted relative risk [RR], 1.
    2 [95% CI, 0.
    7 to 2.
    0]; P= .
    57]).
    Mean severity score of delirium was 23.
    0 vs 24.
    1, respectively (unadjusted difference, –1.
    1; 95% CI, –4.
    6 to 3.
    1).
    A single delirium episode occurred in 16 (3.
    4%) vs 10 (2.
    1%) (unadjusted RD, 1.
    1%; 95% CI,–1.
    7% to 3.
    9%; RR, 1.
    6 [95% CI, 0.
    7 to 3.
    5]).
    Hypoactive subtype in 11 (37.
    9%) vs 5 (20.
    8%)(RD, 11.
    5; 95% CI, –11.
    0% to 35.
    7%; RR, 2.
    2 [95% CI, 0.
    8 to 6.
    3]).
    Median worst pain score was 0 (IQR, 0 to 20) vs 0 (IQR, 0 to 10) (difference 0; 95% CI, 0 to 0).
    Median length of hospitalization was 7 days (IQR, 5 to 10) vs 7 days (IQR, 6 to 10) (difference 0; 95% CI, 0 to 0).
    Death occurred in 8 (1.
    7%) vs 4 (0.
    9%) (unadjusted RD, –0.
    8%; 95% CI, –2.
    2% to 0.
    7%; RR, 2.
    0 [95% CI, 0.
    6 to 6.
    5]).
    Adverse events were reported in 106 episodes in the regional anesthesia group and 102 in the general anesthesia group; the most frequently reported adverse events were nausea and vomiting (47 [44.
    3%] vs 34 [33.
    3%]) and postoperative hypotension (13 [12.
    3%] vs 10 [9.
    8%]).


    Results: Of the 950 patients (mean age 76.
    5 years; 247 (26.
    8%) males), 941 were assessable for the main outcome (6 cancelled and 3 withdrew consent).

    Delirium occurred postoperatively in 29 cases (6.
    2%) in the regional anaesthesia group and 24 (5.
    1%) in the general anaesthesia group (unadjusted risk difference [RD], 1.
    1%; 95% CI, -1.
    7% to 3.
    8%; P = .
    48; unadjusted relative risk [RR], 1.
    2 [95% CI, 0.
    7 to 2.
    0]; P=.
    57])
    。 The mean severity scores of delirium were 23.
    0 and 24.
    1 (unadjusted difference -1.
    1; 95% confidence interval -4.
    6~3.
    1),
    respectively.
    16 (3.
    4%) versus 10 (2.
    1%) had 1 delirium (unadjusted RD, 1.
    1%; 95%CI,-1.
    7%~3.
    9%; RR 1.
    6[95%CI,0.
    7~3.
    5])
    。 11 cases (37.
    9%) vs5 cases (20.
    8%) (RD, 11.
    5; 95%CI, -11.
    0%~35.
    7%; RR,2.
    2[95%CI,0.
    8~6.
    3])
    。 The median of the most severe pain scores were 0 (IQR, 0~20) and 0 (IQR, 0~10) (difference 0; 95%CI,0~0)
    。 The median length of hospital stay was 7 days (IQR, 5~10) and 7 days (IQR, 6~10), respectively (difference 0; 95%CI,0~0)
    。 8 deaths (1.
    7%) vs.
    4 (0.
    9%) (unadjusted RD, -0.
    8%; 95% CI, -2.
    2% to 0.
    7%; RR, 2.
    0 [95% CI, 0.
    6 to 6.
    5]).

    A total of 106 and 102 adverse events were reported in the regional anaesthesia and general anaesthesia groups, respectively, with the most common adverse events being nausea and vomiting (47 [44.
    3%] versus 34 [33.
    3%]) and postoperative hypotension (13 [12.
    3%] versus 10 [9.
    8%]).

    CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

    CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In patients aged 65 years and older undergoing hip fracture surgery, regional anesthesia without sedation did not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium compared with general anesthesia.

    Conclusion and relevance: Regional anesthesia without sedation did not significantly reduce the incidence
    of postoperative delirium compared with general anesthesia in patients aged 65 years and older who underwent hip fracture surgery.

    \ | /

    Recruitment and follow-up of study participants


    Statistical results

    1.
    Baseline characteristics of patients

    2.
    Intraoperative characteristics of hip fracture patients under regional anesthesia and general anesthesia

    3 Primary and secondary outcomes

    4.
    Complications

    effect of regional vs general anesthesia on incidenc .
    pdf

    Article | Wu Xiuyun

    Typography | meat

    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.