echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Study of Nervous System > Neurology: Incidence, prevalence, longitudinal damage and disability of small fiber neuropathy

    Neurology: Incidence, prevalence, longitudinal damage and disability of small fiber neuropathy

    • Last Update: 2021-11-13
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    According to reports, small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a common disease, with a population prevalence of 53 per 100,000 in a large study


    In the United States, a specific SFN ICD-10 diagnostic code (G628) has only recently been provided (October 2015)


    Diagnostic screening

    Most of the early studies of SFN alone or in combination did not include longitudinal results, detailed neurological examination, or exclude patients who developed large fiber involvement


    A study used the SF-36 questionnaire to check the quality of life and found that the physical function scores were significantly worse at the time of evaluation


    In this way, Stephen A Johnson of the Mayo Clinic and others evaluated the incidence and prevalence of SFN patients without large fiber involvement (pure) at the time of onset, and longitudinally evaluated the patients’ comorbidities and cumulative nervous system from a population perspective.


    They compared test-confirmed SFN patients in Olmsted, Minnesota and neighboring counties with a matched control group (January 1, 1998-December 31, 2017) 3:1


    A total of 94 SFN patients were found, with an incidence rate of 1.


    diabetes

    Compared with the control group (median 3, range 1-9), Charlson had more comorbidities (median 6, range 3-9), P<0.


    Myocardial infarction

    17 people developed foot ulcers, 71% of them had DM


    36% of people developed large fiber neuropathy, an average of 5.


    The median neuropathy impairment score (NIS) at onset is 2 (range 0 to 8), and the change/year is +1.


    The proportion of SFN patients who died due to symptom onset was higher, 19%, compared with 12% in the control group, P<0.


    The important significance of this study lies in the discovery: Isolated SFN is not common, but the incidence is increasing


    Isolated SFN is not common, but the incidence is increasing





    Leave a message here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.