Sauce beef abuse food additive Hualian supermarket was sentenced to ten times compensation.

, Ms. Wang sued Beijing Hualian Supermarket Co., Ltd. after she said she believed the meat-and-meat food she bought was in violation of regulations and added caramel color. Reporters learned this morning, the second Central Court of Final Appeal rejected the supermarket appeal, uphold the first instance court made the supermarket return, to Ms. Wang return the purchase price and pay ten times the judgment of compensation.March 21, 2015, Ms. Wang purchased 17 bags of beef from a brand of old soup-rich sauce, secret mellow-scented beef tendons and rich five-scented sheep liver at Hualian Supermarket for a total of 695.20 yuan. Food additives (caramel color) are included in the table of all three food outsourcing assemblies. (Legal Evening News WeChat ID: fzwb_52165216) . Ms. Wang said she learned that the use of the food additive "caramel color" does not include meat products. The products involved were unsafe foods that abused food additives, and she sued the court for a refund of the supermarket's return and ten times the amount.hualian supermarket argued that the food involved itself is a sauce, in line with the use of caramel color, in line with the relevant national safety standards. There is no quality problem with the products sold in the supermarket, there is no obligation to return or refund. Ten times the compensation is premised on the existence of quality and safety issues in the food, and the seller in the knowledge that the product itself exists
seal food safety
standards, the seller should be held liable, and therefore do not agree to Ms. Wang's claim.court of first instance after hearing the judgment, Hualian appealed to the Second Central Court.
.