echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Food News > Food Articles > The epidemic has increased the mislabeling rate of seafood

    The epidemic has increased the mislabeling rate of seafood

    • Last Update: 2021-09-11
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    From SeafoodMedia on September 3, when LeeAnn Applewhite, the founder of Applied Food Technologies, started DNA analysis of commercial seafood samples in 2015 , 75% of the samples were mislabeled , including grouper , sea bream, and catfish.
    And shrimp
    .
     
    LeeAnn Applewhite believes that although the label error rate was only 20% in 2019, this kind of "fraud" is still a problem in the industry
    .
    There are products that have been mislabeled intentionally or unintentionally in the market, and “fraud” has affected the aquaculture industry
    .

     
    Oceana, a non-profit organization, launched a campaign to combat seafood fraud more than ten years ago.
    port MoAmong the samples collected by the nitoring Program, one-fifth of the fish tested were mislabeled
    .
     
    The label error rate is showing a decreasing trend, but the epidemic has exacerbated the rebound of this problem
    .
    "Fraud" behavior is more common in wild seafood
    .

     
    A report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) found that species substitutions and mislabeling are particularly difficult to detect when fish is highly processed into pre-made fish food
    .
    Some operators worry about this problem and turn to technical testing
    .
    In 2019, the international feed manufacturer BioMar announced that the company has developed a DNA test for marine ingredients in its aquaculture feed
    .

    Seafood label grouper catfish
     
      LeeAnn Applewhite believes that although the label error rate was only 20% in 2019, this kind of "fraud" is still a problem in the industry
    .
    There are products that have been mislabeled intentionally or unintentionally in the market, and “fraud” has affected the aquaculture industry
    .

     
      Oceana, a non-profit organization, launched a campaign to combat seafood fraud more than ten years ago.
    port MoAmong the samples collected by the nitoring Program, one-fifth of the fish tested were mislabeled
    .
     
      The label error rate is showing a decreasing trend, but the epidemic has exacerbated the rebound of this problem
    .
    "Fraud" behavior is more common in wild seafood
    .

     
      A report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) found that species substitutions and mislabeling are particularly difficult to detect when fish is highly processed into pre-made fish food
    .
    Some operators worry about this problem and turn to technical testing
    .
    In 2019, the international feed manufacturer BioMar announced that the company has developed a DNA test for marine ingredients in its aquaculture feed
    .
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.