echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Antitumor Therapy > Thorac Cancer: Survival comparison of NSCLC patients with EGFR-T790M mutation, follow-up treatment with osimertinib in different orders

    Thorac Cancer: Survival comparison of NSCLC patients with EGFR-T790M mutation, follow-up treatment with osimertinib in different orders

    • Last Update: 2021-12-03
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com

    At present , when patients with advanced NSCLC are accompanied by EGFR-T790M mutations, the standard treatment is the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib
    .


    For patients with T790M mutation after treatment with the first/second representative skin growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), the benefits of subsequent treatment with osimertinib in different sequences are still unclear


    At present , when patients with advanced NSCLC are accompanied by EGFR-T790M mutations, the standard treatment is the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib


    The study retrospectively screened 3807 patients diagnosed with cancer in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 2013 to 2019
    .


    A total of 76 patients with EGFR-T790M mutation who received osimertinib after re-biopsy or liquid biopsy were included in the analysis


    The study retrospectively screened 3807 patients diagnosed with cancer in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 2013 to 2019


    The EGFR genotyping at the first diagnosis showed that there were Del 19 and L858R mutations in 42 (55.


    Among the 76 patients, 40 (52.


    The median PFS of patients who received osimertinib after first-line treatment with gefitinib, afatinib, or erlotinib were 12.


    There was no difference in ORR between A and B groups (63.
    9% vs 42.
    5%, p = 0.
    063), but there was a difference in DCR (94.
    4% vs 77.
    5%, p = 0.
    036)
    .


    There were no significant differences in PFS (15.


    There was no difference in ORR between A and B groups (63.


    Subgroup analysis showed that for PFS, significant differences were observed in the following factors: patients received EGFR-TKI treatment for ≥1 month (p = 0.
    042, HR = 0.
    55, 95%CI = 0.
    31-0.
    98), low BMI (p = 0.
    042, HR = 0.
    73, 95% CI 0.
    99 = 0.
    54), no chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p = 0.
    005, HR = 0.
    36, 95% CI = 0.
    17-0.
    75)
    .


    OS was only significantly different in patients without COPD (p = 0.


    Subgroup analysis showed that for PFS, significant differences were observed in the following factors: patients received EGFR-TKI treatment for ≥1 month (p = 0.


    In group A, 10 patients (27.
    8%) had brain metastases before osimertinib treatment; the PFS of patients with brain metastases before osimertinib treatment was 11.
    07 months, and the PFS of patients without brain metastases was 16.
    90 months
    .


    Eleven patients (27.
    5%) in group B had brain metastases before osimertinib treatment; PFS of patients with brain metastases before osimertinib treatment was 10.
    27 months, and PFS of patients without brain metastases was 11.
    37 months
    .
    Therefore, osimertinib as a third-line treatment of PFS is better than second-line treatment
    .

    In group A, 10 patients (27.
    8%) had brain metastases before osimertinib treatment; the PFS of patients with brain metastases before osimertinib treatment was 11.
    07 months, and the PFS of patients without brain metastases was 16.
    90 months
    .
    Eleven patients (27.
    5%) in group B had brain metastases before osimertinib treatment; PFS of patients with brain metastases before osimertinib treatment was 10.
    27 months, and PFS of patients without brain metastases was 11.
    37 months
    .
    Therefore, osimertinib as a third-line treatment of PFS is better than second-line treatment
    .
    Ositinib as a third-line treatment of PFS is better than second-line treatment
    .

    The researchers also studied the difference in survival between patients with L858R and Del19 mutations
    .
    Among L858R-positive patients, there was no significant difference in PFS between group A and group B (12.
    57 months vs.
    9.
    00 months, p = 0.
    189)
    .
    In addition, among del19-positive patients, there was no significant difference in PFS between group A and group B (21.
    13 months vs.
    11.
    87 months, p = 0.
    884)
    .
    However, patients with positive L858R and del19 in group A had longer PFS
    .

    The researchers also studied the difference in survival between patients with L858R and Del19 mutations
    .
    Among L858R-positive patients, there was no significant difference in PFS between group A and group B (12.
    57 months vs.
    9.
    00 months, p = 0.
    189)
    .
    In addition, among del19-positive patients, there was no significant difference in PFS between group A and group B (21.
    13 months vs.
    11.
    87 months, p = 0.
    884)
    .
    However, patients with positive L858R and del19 in group A had longer PFS
    .

    In summary, studies have shown that in patients with T790M mutation after the 1/2 generation EGFR-TKI treatment progresses, chemotherapy can affect the efficacy of subsequent osimertinib treatment
    .

    In summary, studies have shown that in patients with T790M mutation after the 1/2 generation EGFR-TKI treatment progresses, chemotherapy can affect the efficacy of subsequent osimertinib treatment
    .

    Original source:

    Original source:

    Wang CC, Lai CH, Chang YP, Chang HC, Tseng CC, Huang KT, Lin MC.
    Comparing survival and treatment response of patients with acquired T790M mutation second-line osimertinib versus sequential treatment of chemotherapy followed by osimertinib: A real-world study .
    Thorac Cancer.
    2021 Oct 26.
    doi: 10.
    1111/1759-7714.
    14198.
    Epub ahead of print.
    PMID: 34704378.

    Wang CC, Lai CH, Chang YP, Chang HC, Tseng CC, Huang KT, Lin MC.
    Comparing survival and treatment response of patients with acquired T790M mutation second-line osimertinib versus sequential treatment of chemotherapy followed by osimertinib: A real-world study .
    Thorac Cancer.
    2021 Oct 26.
    doi: 10.
    1111/1759-7714.
    14198.
    Epub ahead of print.
    PMID: 34704378.
    Leave a message here
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.