echemi logo
Product
  • Product
  • Supplier
  • Inquiry
    Home > Active Ingredient News > Digestive System Information > Interpretation of JSGE peptic ulcer clinical practice guidelines, the most comprehensive in the whole network (part 2)

    Interpretation of JSGE peptic ulcer clinical practice guidelines, the most comprehensive in the whole network (part 2)

    • Last Update: 2021-06-30
    • Source: Internet
    • Author: User
    Search more information of high quality chemicals, good prices and reliable suppliers, visit www.echemi.com
    This guide is only for medical professionals to read and reference.
    This guide is the third edition of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE) Peptic Ulcer Clinical Practice Guide.
    It focuses on the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB), covering drug-induced ulcers and non-pyloric ulcers.
    Helicobacter (Hp) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) ulcers, gastric ulcers and other aspects
    .

    This guide uses the GRADE classification to classify the quality of evidence into A (high), B (medium), C (low) and D (very low); the strength of recommendation is divided into "strong recommendation" or "weak recommendation"
    .

    5.
    Low-dose aspirin-induced ulcers ▌ Treatment 1.
    How should low-dose aspirin (LDA) related peptic ulcers be treated? (1) For LDA-related peptic ulcers, it is recommended to use proton pump inhibitor (PPI) combined with continuous LDA therapy
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: A) Analysis: For patients with a history of LDA-related PUB, the combined use of PPI and continuous LDA after endoscopic hemostasis is compared with the simultaneous use of placebo and PPI, PUB The recurrence rate is comparable
    .

    In addition, continuous LDA treatment can reduce the overall mortality associated with cardiovascular (CV) events [20]
    .

    The rate of ulcer healing in the PPI alone group is similar to that in the PPI and LDA combined treatment group [21]
    .

    2.
    How to combine drugs to effectively reduce the incidence and prevalence of LDA-related peptic ulcers? (1) It is recommended to use PPI or H2RA to reduce the incidence and prevalence of LDA-related peptic ulcers
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: A) 3.
    How to combine drugs to effectively reduce the incidence and prevalence of LDA-related PUB? (1) It is recommended to use PPI or Vonolasan to reduce the incidence and prevalence of LDA-related PUB
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: A) Analysis: Among LDA users with a history of ulcers, compared with 15 mg of lansoprazole, 10 mg and 20 mg of voronoxane can significantly reduce stomach or twelve months The incidence of digital bleeding [22]
    .

    4.
    How to combine medication to effectively reduce the incidence and prevalence of LDA-related PUB recurrence? (1) Eradication of Hp infection and use of PPI can reduce the incidence and prevalence of LDA-related PUB recurrence
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: B) (2) Eradicating Hp infection and using H2RA can reduce the incidence and prevalence of LDA-related PUB recurrence
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: weak; 100% agree; level of evidence: C) 5.
    How should patients with a history of peptic ulcer prevent the recurrence of LDA-related peptic ulcer? (1) It is recommended to use PPI or Vonolasan to reduce the recurrence rate of LDA-related peptic ulcers
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: A) (2) H2RA is recommended to reduce the recurrence rate of LDA-related peptic ulcers
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: weak; 100% agree; level of evidence: C) 6.
    For patients without a history of peptic ulcer, is it necessary to prevent LDA-related peptic ulcer? (1) It is recommended to use PPI for the primary prevention of LDA-related peptic ulcer in patients without a history of ulcers
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 82% agree; level of evidence: A) Analysis: Scheiman et al.
    [23] pointed out that in 73% of patients without a history of peptic ulcer, esomeprazole reduced the digestibility of patients taking LDA The incidence of ulcers
    .

    Ng et al.
    [24] found that in 95% of patients without peptic ulcer, esomeprazole is superior to famotidine in preventing upper gastrointestinal complications related to LDA, clopidogrel and antithrombotic drugs
    .

    7.
    When combined with LDA, can COX-2 selective inhibitors reduce the risk of peptic ulcer compared with non-selective NSAIDs? (1) Compared with non-selective NSAIDs, COX-2 selective inhibitors can reduce the risk of peptic ulcer and bleeding in patients taking LDA
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: A) (2) For low- and medium-risk peptic ulcer patients who require LDA and NSAID treatment, it is recommended to use celecoxib and PPI in combination to prevent gastric injury
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: A) Analysis: For patients at high risk of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal events who require combined use of LDA and NSAID, compared with naproxen and esomeprazole, Celecoxib and PPI are the first choice treatments to reduce the risk of recurrent UGIB [25]
    .

    A study found that in 45% of arthritis patients taking LDA, the risk of gastrointestinal events for celecoxib was lower than naproxen or ibuprofen [26]
    .

    COX-2 selective inhibitors and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk and incidence of cardiovascular events [27], and celecoxib is not inferior to naproxen or naproxen in terms of cardiovascular safety.
    Profen[25,26]
    .

    In addition, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) guidelines recommend that for patients at high risk of peptic ulcer, LDA should not be combined with COX-2 selective inhibitors or non-selective NSAID drugs [28]
    .

    8.
    Among patients taking LDA, is it recommended to use PPI to prevent the recurrence of peptic ulcer in patients receiving NSAID treatment? (1) After receiving NSAID treatment for patients taking LDA, it is recommended to use celecoxib combined with PPI to prevent the recurrence of peptic ulcer
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: A) 6.
    Other ▌ Non-Hp non-NSAID ulcers 1.
    How to treat non-Hp non-NSAID ulcers? (1) It is recommended to use PPI as the initial treatment for non-Hp non-NSAID idiopathic ulcers, and use PPI or H2RA to prevent recurrence
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: weak; 100% agree; level of evidence: C) Analysis: Due to hyperacidity and hypergastrinemia in patients with idiopathic ulcers, PPI is recommended as the initial treatment
    .

    However, Kanno et al.
    [30] reported that after 12 weeks of PPI treatment, the cure rate of idiopathic ulcers was 77.
    4%, while the cure rate of Hp ulcers could reach 95.
    0%
    .

    Therefore, PPI may not be sufficient to treat idiopathic ulcers
    .

    Wong et al.
    [31] reported that without preventive treatment, the 7-year cumulative recurrence rate of the idiopathic ulcer group was 42.
    3%, which was higher than that of the Hp ulcer group (11.
    2%)
    .

    Subsequently, their RCT showed that PPI (lansoprazole: 30 mg/day) and H2RA (famotidine: 40 mg/day) showed no significant difference in the efficacy of preventing recurrence of idiopathic ulcers (at 24 months, The cumulative incidence of UGIB was 0.
    88% and 2.
    63%, respectively, P=0.
    336)[32]
    .

    Therefore, both PPI and H2RA can effectively prevent recurrence
    .

    ▌ Remnant gastric ulcer 1.
    What is the treatment method for remnant gastric ulcer? (1) It is recommended to use PPI to treat residual gastric ulcer
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: C) Analysis: The first choice for the treatment of gastric ulcer is drug therapy
    .

    In an open-label trial comparing omeprazole, cimetidine, sucralfate, colloidal bismuth, and misoprostol in the treatment of residual gastric ulcers, omeprazole was the best in terms of cure rate and speed of cure [ 33], using the above-mentioned drugs for 2 weeks, the ulcer cure rates were 66.
    7%, 43.
    3%, 22.
    2%, 22.
    2%, and 16.
    7%, respectively
    .

    So far, there is no RCT on the eradication effect of Hp for the treatment of residual gastric ulcer
    .

    However, some cross-sectional studies have shown that there is no difference in the positive rate of Hp in the remnant stomach with and without ulcers [34-37]
    .

    From these results, the Hp eradication effect of gastric ulcer remains unclear
    .

    The effect of eradicating the remnant stomach on the prevention of cancer is also unclear
    .

    However, from the perspective of histological improvement after Hp eradication, it is speculated that eradication can effectively prevent gastric cancer
    .

    ▌ Surgical treatment 1.
    Is it recommended to eradicate Hp after peptic ulcer surgery? (1) If Hp is positive, it is recommended to eradicate Hp after peptic ulcer omentum patch or omentum filling
    .

    (Strength of recommendation: strong; 100% agree; level of evidence: A) Analysis: For the treatment of ischemic duodenal ulcer, it is recommended to use PPI or misoprostol as a conservative treatment
    .

    At the same time, check for underlying diseases, such as thrombosis and arterial stenosis
    .

    If the patient's condition worsens after conservative treatment, IVR or surgery may be considered
    .

    Scan the QR code to download the App2w+ guide on the doctor's station, and you can download the reference materials for free: [1]Tarasconi A, Baiocchi GL, Pattonieri V, et al.
    Transcatheter arterial embolization versus surgery for refractory non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis.
    World J Emerg Surg.
    2019;14:3.
    [2]Kyaw M,Tse Y,Ang D,et al.
    Embolization versus surgery for peptic ulcer bleeding after failed endoscopic hemostasis:a meta-analysis.
    Endos Int Open.
    2014;2:E6 –14.
    [3]Selby NM,Kubba AK,Hawkey CJ.
    Acid suppression in peptic ulcer haemorrhage:a'meta-analysis'Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
    2000;14:1119–1126.
    [4]Leontiadis GI,Sharma VK,Howden CW.
    Systematic review and meta-analysis:proton-pump inhibitor treatment for ulcer bleeding reduces transfusion requirements and hospital stay-results from the Cochrane Collaboration.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
    2005;22:169–174.
    [5]George S,George G , Androniki P, et al.
    High-dose vs.
    low-dose proton pump inhibitors post endoscopic hemostasis in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer:a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.
    Turk J Gastroenterol.
    2018;29:22–31.
    [6]Jian Z,Li H,Race NS, et al.
    Is the era of intravenous proton pump inhibitors coming to an end in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers?Meta-analysis of the published literature.
    Br J Clin Pharmacol.
    2016;82:880–889.
    [7]Valgimigli M,Bueno H,Byrne RA,ESC Scientific Document Group;ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines(CPG);ESC National Cardiac Societies et al.
    2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS:The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery(EACTS)Eur Heart J.
    2018;39:213–260.
    [8]Malfertheiner P,Megraud F,O'Morain CA,et al.
    Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report.
    Gut.
    2017;66:6–30.
    [9]Chan FK,To KF, Wu JC,et al.
    Eradication of Helicobacter pylori and risk of peptic ulcers in patients starting long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a randomised trial.
    Lancet.
    2002;359:9–13.
    [10]Vergara M ,Catalan M,Gisbert JP,et al.
    Meta-analysis:role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of peptic ulcer in NSAID users.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
    2005;21:1411–1418.
    [11]Tang CL,Ye F, Liu W,et al.
    Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection reduces the incidence of peptic ulcer disease in patients using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs:a meta-analysis.
    Helicobacter.
    2012;17:286–296.
    [12]Chan FK,Wong VW ,Suen BY,et al.
    Combination of a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and a proton-pump inhibitor for prevention of recurrent ulcer bleeding in patients at very high risk:a double-blind,randomised trial.
    Lancet.
    2007;369:1621–1626.
    [13]Emery P, Zeidler H,Kvien TK,et al.
    Celecoxib versus diclofenac in long-term management of rheumatoid arthritis:randomized double-blind comparison.
    Lancet.
    1999;354:2106–2111.
    [PubMed][Google Scholar][14]Laine L, Harper S, Simon T, et al.
    A randomized trial comparing the effect of rofecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitor, with that of ibuprofen on the gastroduodenal mucosa of patients with osteoarthritis: Rofecoxib Osteoarthritis Endoscopy Study Group.
    Gastroenterology.
    1999;117: 776–783.
    [PubMed][Google Scholar][15]Pavelka K,Recker DP,Verburg KM.
    Valdecoxib is as effective as diclofenac in the management of rheumatoid arthritis with a lower incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers:results of a 26-week trial.
    Rheumatology.
    2003;42:1207–1215.
    [16]Sakamoto C,Kawai T,Nakamura S, et al.
    Comparison of gastroduodenal ulcer incidence in healthy Japanese subjects taking celecoxib or loxoprofen evaluated by endoscopy:a placebo-controlled,double-blind 2-week study.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
    2013;37:346–354.
    [17]Goldstein JL ,Kivitz AJ,Verburg KM,et al.
    A comparison of the upper gastrointestinal mucosal effects of valdecoxib,naproxen and placebo in healthy elderly subjects.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
    2003;18:125–132.
    [18]Feng GS,Ma JL, Wong BC,et al.
    Celecoxib-related gastroduodenal ulcer and cardiovascular events in a randomized trial for gastric cancer prevention.
    World J Gastroenterol.
    2008;14:4535–4539.
    [19]Yuan JQ,Tsoi KK,Yang M,et al.
    Systematic review with network meta-analysis:comparative effectiveness and safety of strategies for preventing NSAID-associated gastrointestinal toxicity.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
    2016;43:1262–1275.
    [20]Sung JJ,Lau JY,Ching JY,et al.
    Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial.
    Ann Intern Med.
    2010;152:1-9.
    [21]Liu CP,Chen WC,Lai KH,et al.
    Esomeprazole alone compared with esomeprazole plus aspirin for the treatment of aspirin-related peptic ulcers.
    Am J Gastroenterol.
    2012;107:1022–1029.
    [22]Kawai T,Oda K,Funao N,et al.
    Vonoprazan prevents low-dose aspirin-associated ulcer recurrence:randomised phase 3 study.
    Gut.
    2018;67:1033–1041.
    [23]Scheiman JM,Devereaux PJ,Herlitz J,et al.
    Prevention of peptic ulcers with esomeprazole in patients at risk of ulcer development treated with low- dose acetylsalicylic acid:a randomised,controlled trial(OBERON)Heart.
    2011;97:797–802.
    [24]Ng FH,Tunggal P,Chu WM,et al.
    Esomeprazole compared with famotidine in the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction.
    Am J Gastroenterol.
    2012;107:389–396.
    [25]Chan FKL,Ching JYL,Tse YK,et al.
    Gastrointestinal safety of celecoxib versus naproxen in patients with cardiothrombotic diseases and arthritis after upper gastrointestinal bleeding(CONCERN ):an industry-independent,double-blind,double-dummy,randomised trial.
    Lancet.
    2017;389:2375–2382.
    [26]Nissen SE,Yeomans ND,Solomon DH,et al.
    Cardiovascular safety of celecoxib,naproxen, or ibuprofen for arthritis.
    N Engl J Med.
    2016;375:2519–2529.
    [27]Mcgettigan P,Henry D.
    Cardiovascular risk and inhibition of cyclooxygenase:a systematic review of the observational studies of selective and nonselective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase 2.
    JAMA.
    2006;296:1633–1644.
    [28]Lanza FL,Chan FKL,Quigley EMM.
    Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications.
    Am J Gastroenterol.
    2009;104:728–738.
    [29]Mcoll KEL,LE-Nujumi AM,Chittajallu RS,et al.
    A study of the pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori negative chronic duodenal ulceration.
    Gut.
    1993;34:762–768.
    [30]Kanno T, Iijima K, Abe Y, et al.
    Helicobacter pylori-negative and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-negative idiopathic peptic ulcers show refractoriness and high recurrence incidence: multicenter follow-up study of peptic ulcers in Japan.
    Dig Endosc.
    2016;28:556–563.
    [31]Wong GL,Wong VW,Chan Y,et al.
    High incidence of mortality and recurrent bleeding in patients with Helicobacter pylori-negative idiopathic bleeding ulcers.
    Gastroenterology.
    2009;137:525–531.
    [32]Wong GLH,Lau LHS,Ching JYL,et al.
    Prevention of recurrent idiopathic gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding:a double-blind,randomised trial.
    Gut.
    2020;69:652-657 .
    [33]Janke A,Stasiewicz J,Namiot Z,et al.
    Treatment of gastric stump ulcer:an open study with five drugs.
    Hepatogastroenterology.
    2000;47:1195–1198.
    [34]Leivonene MK,Haglund CH,Nordling SFA .
    Helicobacter pylori infection after partial gastrectomy for peptic ulcer and its role in relapsing disease.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
    1997;9:371–374.
    [35]Lee YT,Sung JJ,Choi CL,et al.
    Ulcer recurrence after gastric surgery :is Helicobacter pylori the culprit?Am J Gastroenterol.
    1998;93:928–931.
    [36]Huang WH,Wang HH,Wu WW,et al.
    Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with ulcer recurrence after partial gastrectomy.
    Hepatogastroenterology.
    2004; 51:1551–1553.
    [37]Schilling D,Adamek HE,Wilke J,et al.
    Prevalence and clinical importance of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients after partial gastric resection for peptic ulcer disease.
    Z Gastroenterol.
    1999;37:127–132.
    [38]Tomoari Kamada,Kiichi Satoh,Toshiyuki Itoh,et al .
    Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2020.
    J Gastroenterol.
    2021;56(4):303–322.
    This article is an English version of an article which is originally in the Chinese language on echemi.com and is provided for information purposes only. This website makes no representation or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness ownership or reliability of the article or any translations thereof. If you have any concerns or complaints relating to the article, please send an email, providing a detailed description of the concern or complaint, to service@echemi.com. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days. Once verified, infringing content will be removed immediately.

    Contact Us

    The source of this page with content of products and services is from Internet, which doesn't represent ECHEMI's opinion. If you have any queries, please write to service@echemi.com. It will be replied within 5 days.

    Moreover, if you find any instances of plagiarism from the page, please send email to service@echemi.com with relevant evidence.