Organic Nutrition: Is It Really Important?

Organic produce may not be more nutritious than "ordinary" products, a massive scientific review showed yesterday. But because that's not the main reason people buy them, is it important?
Is the nutritional value of organic produce really important? Therefore, as long as the quality is not
...
I'll say no!Research published yesterday by FoodNavigator
shows that when it comes to nutritional value and the risk of bacterial contamination, there is no difference between organic products and products produced by traditional farming methods.study has caused many loud and different reactions, and they clearly feel that the study is off the point. After all, when it comes to organic matter, does nutritional value really matter?, the study's authors acknowledge that the vast majority of people do not buy organic produce because of their nutritional value. They buy it for a number of other reasons: the environment, animal welfare, reduced exposure to pesticides, or the belief that organic food tastes better.twiigs.com
the
OTA
) noted that awareness of the relationship between low pesticide residues and health benefits is the primary reason consumers choose to buy organic products. Keep in mind that studies have also found low levels of pesticides in organic products.

Bushway, executive director and chief executive
of OTA
, said: "Chemicals are used in organic foods with minimal residues in end products. Moreover, organic meat contains the least antibiotic-resistant bacteria because of the ban on the use of antibiotics, including low-grade antibiotics used daily for growth. "I'm not
with
Bushway on this issue, but right now it doesn't seem like the author is at the top of the list either.
Crystal Smith-Spangler
, who led the study, said: "Our goal is to uncover evidence that this is information that people can use to make decisions based on their own considerations of pesticides, budgets and other aspects. " so, is nutrition important?"to answer in one word: No. What about the next one
?fact, as long as organic produce (or traditional products) are not nutritionally insistingotrophic, there is no dispute. The whole thing becomes irrelevant to the conversation - it means that the "epic battle" between organic and non-organic believers has to be fought in different places., for example, director Dr.
Urvashi Rangan
noted that Consumer Reports is a supplement to consumer safety and sustainability, and that organic is intended as a healthy farming method and an environmentally beneficial approach."In fact, this and many other findings, including nutritional analysis, are not conclusive, but that doesn't mean that organics are not good for nutrition, health and safety,"
Said. Headded: "Even putting everything aside, the fact that antibiotics are banned from organic production to raise animals has huge public health benefits. This was also cited in the study, but not in the title and the author's response. Iagree with him. There are several reasons why people may want to buy organic products, from pesticides and chemical exposure to the notation that these products usually just taste better - except to avoid genetically modified organisms and debate about whether organic produce is more sustainable. Is to take these into account, I think, will have to wait for a new day!Nathan Gray is
science
FoodNavigator.com
and
NutraIngredients.com
and the United States. He wrote about the link between food science and nutrition including flavor formulations, less salt, intestinal health, nutrition and disease.
Nathan Gray
has a place in human biotechnology companies that specialize in nutrition reporting.